No matter how passionate you are about this year's election, do not discuss it at work

Things To Know Before Discussing The 2012 Presidential Election At Work

What's Going On

No matter how passionate you are about this year's election, do not discuss it at work


Although this year’s Presidential Election is one filled with immense emotion, it is important that you keep the conversation as far from your work desk as possible. There have been instances in which individuals have been reprimanded and/or fired for discussing this year’s Presidential Election.

An Illinois woman came to work wearing a picture of President Obama and Vice President Joe Biden with the words “Dumb and Dumber” written underneath their faces. She offended her co-workers who support the President and VP Joe Biden, and was immediately sent to HR where she was given a verbal warning and asked to change her shirt.

Reputable business publication Inc Magazine, offered up some key things to remember before you decide to talk politics at your job:


Rule No. 1: There’s No Free Speech at Work

Part of the problem comes when employees assume that they have a right to free speech at work. They are wrong. The truth is that, outside the public sector, the First Amendment doesn’t really protect employees’ speech in the workplace, attorneys say. “Federal law is straightforward: If you’re a private-sector employer, there are not a lot of restrictions on what you can and can’t do” to restrict speech, Beck says. But telling employees just what not to say can be problematic as well.

Rule No. 2:  Be Careful What You Ban

So can you just tell your workers not to talk politics at all? It’s not quite that simple. The trouble is that political conversations (especially in their most personal and most inflammatory incarnations) can easily veer into issues of race, gender, age, or religion–the so-called protected classes, spelled out in the federal Civil Rights Act’s Title VII. And you don’t want your well-intentioned policy to appear to be trampling on the rights of members of any of those classes. For instance, a Memphis lawsuit emerged recently when a worker thought her boss’s anti-Obama remarks were racially motivated.

Rule No. 3:  Know Your Local Law

Moreover, political speech and behavior are covered by an uneven, overlapping patchwork of rules. In addition to the groups protected by Title VII, you may need to worry about labor rules. Is a “Teamsters for Obama” T-shirt a political statement, for instance, or a pro-union statement? The answer probably depends on who’s reading it. But if you try to ban it, you could find yourself going toe-to-toe with the pro-union National Labor Relations Board. Some state laws also create additional protected groups, or additional restrictions on politics-related behavior. In some states, notes Beck, employers can’t call mandatory meetings or rallies to support a candidate. He says: “In many states, I [as an employer] can’t discriminate against employees who support a candidate I don’t like.” California, meanwhile, prohibits employers from limiting an employee’s off-duty political activity–even a run for office, says Chas Rampenthal, an Inc. contributor and general counsel at LegalZoom. Bottom line: If you’re thinking of mixing politics and the workplace, you need to have a lawyer on speed dial.

Rule No. 4:  Be Consistent

Legal experts suggest that companies offer clear policies–and then enforce them evenhandedly. An electronic-communications policy could bar employees from using company equipment for personal use. That might be enough to restrict them from following a candidate’s Facebook page, for instance. Rampenthal also suggests that employers have a broadly enforced nonsolicitation policy, barring workers from collecting money for any cause–whether a political campaign or a charity walkathon. Beck suggests something different. “What I recommend is that employers have a policy that’s very clear: Any political discussions in the workplace cannot interfere with an employee’s job duties, co-workers’ job duties, or the employer’s business,” he says.



One comment

  1. I’m the sort that doesn’t mind taking a stand on an issue and/or candidate. And yes, sometimes it causes me grief, but most of the time, it is OK. I will say this, however; when in the workplace or other place where people are sort there for another reason (like church), I make a point to be very careful to make my political statements only about the issue itself, and totally avoid any backhanded comments about the candidates themselves. Like, I might say something like, “I think welfare should be limited to only 24 months of foodstamps,” instead of “Obama is the foodstamp president” or “Romney wants children to starve.” Those last two statements will do nothing but get people mad at you for insulting their candidate. Granted, someone might get mad at you for taking a position on foodstamps, but it is less likely to happen than when you take a pot shot at the candidate(s).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *